I assume their lawyers wouldn't let them use OSM. Mapping is often a controversial issue, they want some form of control over what they display on maps.google.com. For example, Tibet: http://birdhouse.org/blog/2006/04/21/wheres-tibet/
Tom Longson (nym) http://truefalsemaybe.com/ On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Thanks goodness for Google, finally providing decent tools for > producing crowd-sourced base map data! I bet they even use a decent > database!" > > Sufficient? > > P. > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:51 AM, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What no mention of GMM on geowanking yet? And I was looking forward to >> the disucssion! >> >> http://www.opengeodata.org/?p=307 >> >> Best >> >> Steve > _______________________________________________ > Geowanking mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking > _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
