On 1 Jul 2008, at 16:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It also a bit scary to see the postmodern arguments against > geographic analysis crop up. They also have an important role to > play in the critique of research, but I'd also argue they have > crippled the discipline of geography. The focus has become what is > wrong with maps and analysis and not what problems it can solve > (full rant here - http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=b3406b).
Where's the rant against post-modernist arguments in that article? All I saw in the article and that it was responding to was issues surrounding quite dry legal aspects of corporate data ownership. Cheers, A -- Andrew Larcombe Freelance Geospatial, Database & Web Programming web: http://www.andrewlarcombe.co.uk : http://blog.andrewl.net email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: +44 (7760) 258623 icq: 306690163 _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
