Hi,
I'm sorry, not related to the question as such but I have a hard time
seeing how concerns about indigenous rights and knowledge qualifies as
"far left". Not that it's ever been "far left, but it's become very
mainstream within environmentalism in the last couple decades.
But yes, it is important to note that the critique of technocratic
environmentalism comes from the broad left as well.
Thanks,
JP
Le 19-11-27 à 12 h 20, DG Webster a écrit :
In most cases it is a matter of degree. Not whether we should curb
pollution or conserve resources, but how much and for whom. Scientists
are usually accused of putting too much emphasis on environmental
conservation while ignoring economic costs. Yes, it's good to reduce
nutrient pollution, but if that means people will pay more for
groceries, how do we balance that tradeoff? Of course, conservatives
go too far in the other direction, arguing that markets provide the
best solution even when they are imperfect and incomplete. Also, folks
on the far left note that technocratic environmental policy often
leaves out the concerns and knowledge of indigenous people and other
minorities.
best,
dgwebster
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 7:17 AM Kevin Olsen <ols...@montclair.edu
<mailto:ols...@montclair.edu>> wrote:
I am working on my spring semester lesson plans for classes on Law
and
Policy.
I am looking for a good example of a concept that will be presented.
One of the objections that intelligent conservatives make to our
current
system of environmental laws (at least in the United States) is
that it
does not balance technical expertise and democratic accountability.
They argue that only trained technocrats with specialized
knowledge are
qualified to write regulations but everyone in a democracy must
have the
right to participate in the process.
Of course when a new regulation is proposed, there is a comment
period
and the agency proposing the regulation makes every effort to engage
stakeholders. The intelligent conservative often believes that these
measures are not sufficient, hence the objections.
So, can anyone suggest a situation where technocratic expertise and
democratic accountability have been in a legitimate conflict?
The conservatives will argue that there are plenty of examples of
regulatory over reach.
Compact fluorescent light bulbs? They save 75% of the
electricity
used for lighting
Can't drive my car on the beach anymore? Nesting seabirds are an
important part of the ecosystem
Can't build my new house within 300 feet of a creek? Ever
hear of
runoff pollution?
Every example I try to find for my lesson plans seems to suggest that
There Is No Such Thing As Regulatory Over Reach.....or perhaps it
would
be politically neutral to say that the vast majority regulations are
promulgated for very good reasons. And furthermore, the agency
proposing the regulation has had its power conferred by the
legislative
branch.
There must be a good example where an environmental regulation has
come
into a legitimate conflict with the democratic process.
Full disclosure, I am of course a tree-hugging, Union Dues paying
lifelong Democrat. (Maybe that is why I am struggling with this
question)
Happy Thanksgiving to the List Subscribers in the United States,
Thank you,
Kevin
--
“Of all the inanimate objects, of all men's creations, books are
the nearest to us for they contain our very thoughts, our
ambitions, our indignations, our illusions, our fidelity to the
truth, and our persistent leanings to error. But most of all they
resemble us in their precious hold on life.”
― Joseph Conrad
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to gep-ed+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:gep-ed%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/b04a14b5-c5de-f0c7-e433-f7ef01cecf77%40montclair.edu.
--
D.G. Webster
Associate Professor
Environmental Studies Program
Dartmouth College
6182 Steele Hall
Hanover, NH 03755
phone: 603-646-0213
http://sites.dartmouth.edu/websterlab
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to gep-ed+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:gep-ed+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/CAKPQqY7exx2z_D_F21o8JKi1wiPOnmobf9ngt7bGGLK%3DY2hFHw%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/CAKPQqY7exx2z_D_F21o8JKi1wiPOnmobf9ngt7bGGLK%3DY2hFHw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to gep-ed+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/5c086eca-4f88-2e52-984b-cf75b80445b3%40gmail.com.
