Ok, add me to that list as well. I'll start looking at that list. /Klas
----- Original Message ----- From: "Weston M. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:46:00 +0000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE deployment verifier) > Yes, at present there are at least four people, that I know of anyway, > interested in the VerificationEngine: > > Weston (me) > Jonathan Duty > Srihari S > Denes > > I think you are right, we basically want to start with a list of our > verification requirements and take it from there. > > > > Regards, > Weston > > On Wednesday 13 August 2003 06:47 pm, klas axell wrote: > > I have been reading through some of the spec today and the thing I can > > begin working on is the verifier. I saw in another post in this thread that > > someone was talking about making a list (ie simplify the spec) of what the > > verifier has to verify. That would indeed be a good starting point. Is > > someone working on this list of requirements? > > > > /Klas > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Weston M. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:48:26 +0000 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE deployment verifier) > > > > > I agree with Srihari in that the Verification manager does not have to > > > implement the spec interfaces, however, the DeploymentManager does, this > > > would be where we would implment DDRoot, DDConfig etc.....in some ways > > > the DeploymentManager would just use the services of the > > > VerificatinoEngine as one step in the process of actual deployment. > > > > > > Is this in line with what you guys were thinking? > > > > > > On Wednesday 13 August 2003 01:52 pm, Jonathan Duty wrote: > > > > When we implement this module, we could actually implement it to > > > > exactly follow the API specs (JSR 88). That means implementing the > > > > DeploymentManager interface on top of it and such. That way any > > > > application (ant, Eclipse, etc) that is equipped to deploy packages > > > > could interface with it. It would just fall short of actually > > > > communicating with MBeans and deploying the package. > > > > > > > > When this module is used internally (within the REAL deployment > > > > manager) it could just bypass or override the Verification's Deployment > > > > manager. > > > > > > > > ~Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Srihari S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:43 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE deployment verifier) > > > > > > > > Hi All > > > > When I was going thru the deployment api spec I thought it would be > > > > good > > > > to bring up some points: > > > > > > > > From a preliminary reading of the spec i saw there are no apis > > > > explicitly > > > > designed to do the verification > > > > of a deployable unit. From this I infer that the verifier can be an > > > > internal > > > > module which could be used > > > > by the deploy tool. So we could go full steam on its design and > > > > implementation. In this regard I am trying to > > > > jot the list of checks that our verifier will have to do (This is > > > > mentioned > > > > in the j2ee specs). > > > > So in a way it will be equivalent to arriving at requirement specs for > > > > the > > > > verifier. > > > > With the list of dos and donts that a verifier has to achieve we could > > > > go > > > > abt with design.Also the design of > > > > ant hooks can be taken care.Can we?? > > > > > > > > Next is something abt the big picture. Certainly the verifer is a small > > > > part > > > > of the deployment process. > > > > But to achieve compliance we will have to implement the deployment spec > > > > as a > > > > whole. Has anyone given > > > > thought to this issue? > > > > > > > > regards > > > > Hari > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Weston M. Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:33 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE deployment verifier) > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I think splitting them up would be good.... > > > > > > > > Weston > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:41 pm, Jonathan Duty wrote: > > > > > I'm creating a maven module to add to the cvs project. > > > > > Do we want to plan on the DeploymentManager, VerificationEngine, and > > > > > DeploymentEngine being in one module? > > > > > > > > > > What do you all think? > > > > > > > > > > ~Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > Weston M. Price wrote: > > > > > >Just thought I should start a new thread.... > > > > > > > > > > > >My KMail was getting dominated! > > > > > > > > > > > >Weston -- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze
