Sounds like something that ought to be on the wiki so that people can add things/comment easily.
Adrian -----Original Message----- From: Weston M. Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 August 2003 09:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE deployment verifier) Yes, please do post it whenever you get a chance. Weston On Thursday 14 August 2003 11:13 am, klas axell wrote: > I have started writing a list with all the things that the verifyer > has to check in a deployed package. The list contains things as "Is > the home interface a sub interface of the EJBHome interface, Is the > remote interface a sub interface of the EJBObject interface, Are the > create methods in home implemented in the ejb class" and so on. Is > this somthing that I should post? The list is not complete but it > might be a good starting point for us? > > /Klas > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Weston M. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:46:00 +0000 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE deployment verifier) > > > Yes, at present there are at least four people, that I know of > > anyway, interested in the VerificationEngine: > > > > Weston (me) > > Jonathan Duty > > Srihari S > > Denes > > > > I think you are right, we basically want to start with a list of our > > verification requirements and take it from there. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > Weston > > > > On Wednesday 13 August 2003 06:47 pm, klas axell wrote: > > > I have been reading through some of the spec today and the thing I > > > can begin working on is the verifier. I saw in another post in > > > this thread that someone was talking about making a list (ie > > > simplify the spec) of what the verifier has to verify. That would > > > indeed be a good starting point. Is someone working on this list > > > of requirements? > > > > > > /Klas > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Weston M. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:48:26 +0000 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE deployment > > > verifier) > > > > > > > I agree with Srihari in that the Verification manager does not > > > > have to implement the spec interfaces, however, the > > > > DeploymentManager does, this would be where we would implment > > > > DDRoot, DDConfig etc.....in some ways the DeploymentManager > > > > would just use the services of the VerificatinoEngine as one > > > > step in the process of actual deployment. > > > > > > > > Is this in line with what you guys were thinking? > > > > > > > > On Wednesday 13 August 2003 01:52 pm, Jonathan Duty wrote: > > > > > When we implement this module, we could actually implement it > > > > > to exactly follow the API specs (JSR 88). That means > > > > > implementing the DeploymentManager interface on top of it and > > > > > such. That way any application (ant, Eclipse, etc) that is > > > > > equipped to deploy packages could interface with it. It would > > > > > just fall short of actually communicating with MBeans and > > > > > deploying the package. > > > > > > > > > > When this module is used internally (within the REAL > > > > > deployment > > > > > manager) it could just bypass or override the Verification's > > > > > Deployment manager. > > > > > > > > > > ~Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Srihari S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:43 AM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE deployment > > > > > verifier) > > > > > > > > > > Hi All > > > > > When I was going thru the deployment api spec I thought it > > > > > would be good to bring up some points: > > > > > > > > > > From a preliminary reading of the spec i saw there are no apis > > > > > explicitly designed to do the verification > > > > > of a deployable unit. From this I infer that the verifier can be an > > > > > internal > > > > > module which could be used > > > > > by the deploy tool. So we could go full steam on its design and > > > > > implementation. In this regard I am trying to > > > > > jot the list of checks that our verifier will have to do (This is > > > > > mentioned > > > > > in the j2ee specs). > > > > > So in a way it will be equivalent to arriving at requirement specs > > > > > for the > > > > > verifier. > > > > > With the list of dos and donts that a verifier has to achieve we > > > > > could go > > > > > abt with design.Also the design of > > > > > ant hooks can be taken care.Can we?? > > > > > > > > > > Next is something abt the big picture. Certainly the verifer > > > > > is a small part of the deployment process. > > > > > But to achieve compliance we will have to implement the deployment > > > > > spec as a > > > > > whole. Has anyone given > > > > > thought to this issue? > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > Hari > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Weston M. Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:33 AM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE deployment > > > > > verifier) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I think splitting them up would be good.... > > > > > > > > > > Weston > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:41 pm, Jonathan Duty wrote: > > > > > > I'm creating a maven module to add to the cvs project. Do we > > > > > > want to plan on the DeploymentManager, VerificationEngine, > > > > > > and DeploymentEngine being in one module? > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you all think? > > > > > > > > > > > > ~Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > Weston M. Price wrote: > > > > > > >Just thought I should start a new thread.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > >My KMail was getting dominated! > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Weston
