The "Transaction" namespace pollution is getting so annoying that I just want to provide JTA because every persistence backend we support knows how to handle JTA nicely if it is provided to it.
-Brian
On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 04:01 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
I need to transparently wrap whether I am using JTA, OJB local transactions, ODMG transactions implemented as a wrapper around OJB local transactions (the most common case), Hibernate local transactions, or JDBC local transactions.
As both OJB and Hibernate can wrap JTA, and JTA can wrap JDBC, it seems the easiest way to provide the greatest functionality is to find a convenient way to provide a JTA implementation around local transactions then simply expose JTA to my users =)
-Brian
On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 03:27 PM, Chris Perrin wrote:
Do you need JTA or just transaction support? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian McCallister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:23 PM Subject: [OT] Non-EJB container JTA
Sorry for the off-topic posting, but with the collective expertise here...
Anyone know of a free/open JTA implementation that is not bound to an EJB container?
Much Appreciated!
-Brian
