Attention is currently required from: neels, laforge, pespin, fixeria.
Max has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/29084 )

Change subject: SIGTRAN: cache Optional Data for SCCP CR/CC/RLSD
......................................................................


Patch Set 15:

(8 comments)

File src/sccp_scoc.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/29084/comment/4363d4d6_ffda9ece
PS15, Line 642:                 /* optional: importance */
> why is this line removed here? this is non related.
The RLC does not have optional importance field.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/29084/comment/b870683f_95186f62
PS15, Line 600:         if (
> Ack
We shouldn't. Shall I replace it with assert or just drop?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/29084/comment/6fa8a826_fd35be4a
PS15, Line 606:         } else
> remove curly braces in the if.
Actually it's better to add them to else according to 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#placing-braces-and-spaces


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/29084/comment/51617eeb_e7923d15
PS15, Line 630:         if (xua_drop_data_check(prim, SCCP_MAX_DATA, "cache 
overrun"))
> ... […]
Done


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/29084/comment/f4acfafc_5ad77dad
PS15, Line 635:                         LOGP(DLSCCP, LOGL_ERROR, "replacing 
unsent %u bytes of optional data cache with %s optional data\n",
> NOTICE
I think it's error - this situation should not arise normally.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/29084/comment/da5d2afe_a69997e6
PS15, Line 639: msgb_alloc(SCCP_MAX_DATA, "SCCP optional data cache for 
CR/CC/RLSD");
> Ack
Done


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/29084/comment/5d2bd69d_a2630137
PS15, Line 639: msgb_alloc(SCCP_MAX_DATA, "SCCP optional data cache for 
CR/CC/RLSD");
> Ack
Done


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/29084/comment/699f9d67_3b1a53c1
PS15, Line 784:                         xua_msg_add_sccp_addr(xua, 
SUA_IEI_DEST_ADDR, &conn->calling_addr);
> why is this line removed here? this is non related.
Similar to the above: the comments are placed to match the fields order in the 
spec.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/29084
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: libosmo-sccp
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I0033faf9da393418930252233ce74d62cd1cef8a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29084
Gerrit-PatchSet: 15
Gerrit-Owner: Max <msur...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofm...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofm...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 16:07:09 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to