Attention is currently required from: fixeria, pespin. falconia has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34448?usp=email )
Change subject: SMS over GSUP: implement vty config of SMSC routing ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) File include/osmocom/hlr/hlr_sms.h: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34448/comment/185a6aa4_a806beb9 PS2, Line 17: void smsc_del(struct hlr_smsc *smsc); > Well, this "usual" naming does not apply here: […] I modeled this code after the existing one for EUSEs and USSD routes, which - as @fixeria noted - uses _del rather than _free. What is the community consensus here? Should I change my patch to use _free? Should all existing usage of _del in osmo-hlr also be changed to _free? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34448?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hlr Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I1624dcd9d22b4efca965ccdd1c74f0063a94a33c Gerrit-Change-Number: 34448 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: falconia <fal...@freecalypso.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:59:05 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment
