Attention is currently required from: fixeria, laforge, neels.

pespin has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/36538?usp=email )

Change subject: add osmo_stats_report_lock api
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(2 comments)

Patchset:

PS2:
> I wonder why after all the discussions around atomic counters you decided to 
> go with the presumably  […]
And for the case at hand, I still belive it makes much more sense to simply use 
an osmo_itq to pass the related updated counters every X seconds.

The fact that the counter is atomic doesn't help with the fact that you still 
need to access objects which are in a llist which may be changing over time. So 
let's avoid problems, imho use an osmo_itq there and simply abandon this patch 
as we don't really need it now.


File src/core/stats.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/36538/comment/b0a94212_a2dda1f5
PS2, Line 791: static pthread_mutex_t *g_report_lock = NULL;
> just a thought, it would be far simpler to only publish this pointer on 
> public API. […]
I think having APIs is better, it allows changing the implementation later on 
to whatever else.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/36538?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib335bea7d2a440ca284e6c439066f96456bf2c2d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 36538
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofm...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofm...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 08:50:27 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofm...@sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to