Attention is currently required from: laforge.

dexter has posted comments on this change by dexter. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41874?usp=email )

Change subject: esim/http_json_api: extend JSON API with server functionality
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(3 comments)

Commit Message:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41874/comment/b413bf5d_165a5e1f?usp=email :
PS1, Line 17: tread
> treat
Done


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41874/comment/dfd56789_3fb07f7c?usp=email :
PS1, Line 27: the tread
> "to treat the header"? Not sure what you mean
Done


File pySim/esim/es2p.py:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41874/comment/7ad11e30_61cdff78?usp=email :
PS1, Line 252: The API user is expected to override
> wouldn't it be better to have an abc. […]
My original idea is that that the APU user only overrides the methods he needs. 
The other methods then would still exist, but requests would return Failed.

I have thought a bit about this and now I think that an approach with abstract 
classes is indeed better since it is more specific. The SMDP+ side should 
always implement all methods expect the one for call_handleDownloadProgressInfo 
and on the MNO side we should see call_handleDownloadProgressInfo as the only 
method. The class model now reflects that.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41874?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: pysim
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I277aa90fddb5171c4bf6c3436259aa371d30d092
Gerrit-Change-Number: 41874
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:53:44 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <[email protected]>

Reply via email to