pespin has submitted this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/18323 )

Change subject: tbf_ul: Fix UL ACK not sent to MS if intermediate UL block is 
lost
......................................................................

tbf_ul: Fix UL ACK not sent to MS if intermediate UL block is lost

In normal conditions ACKing of UL blocks is only sent every
SEND_ACK_AFTER_FRAMES (20) frames. Which means if CV=0 is received (and
hence no more packets are received) less than 20 frames before a lost,
the PCU won't ask for a retransmission and wait there until some timer
destroys the TBF.

This issue is shown by TTCN3 test PCU_Tests.ttcn
TC_ul_intermediate_retrans.

Unit tests triggering this condition are adapted. Some similar tests are
not triggering it because BSN/CV relation being used is totally wrong
(like CV=0 being sent on a BSN with previous value than others).

Change-Id: I9b4ef7b7277efa645bdb5becf2e9f6b32c99a9b1
---
M src/tbf_ul.cpp
M src/tbf_ul.h
M tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp
M tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Approvals:
  laforge: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
  daniel: Looks good to me, approved
  Jenkins Builder: Verified



diff --git a/src/tbf_ul.cpp b/src/tbf_ul.cpp
index 9899580..009dfcb 100644
--- a/src/tbf_ul.cpp
+++ b/src/tbf_ul.cpp
@@ -188,6 +188,9 @@
        const struct gprs_rlc_data_info *rlc,
        uint8_t *data, struct pcu_l1_meas *meas)
 {
+       const struct gprs_rlc_data_block_info *rdbi;
+       struct gprs_rlc_data *block;
+
        int8_t rssi = meas->have_rssi ? meas->rssi : 0;

        const uint16_t ws = m_window.ws();
@@ -218,10 +221,8 @@
        for (block_idx = 0; block_idx < rlc->num_data_blocks; block_idx++) {
                int num_chunks;
                uint8_t *rlc_data;
-               const struct gprs_rlc_data_block_info *rdbi =
-                       &rlc->block_info[block_idx];
+               rdbi = &rlc->block_info[block_idx];
                bool need_rlc_data = false;
-               struct gprs_rlc_data *block;

                LOGPTBFUL(this, LOGL_DEBUG,
                          "Got %s RLC data block: CV=%d, BSN=%d, SPB=%d, PI=%d, 
E=%d, TI=%d, bitoffs=%d\n",
@@ -330,14 +331,13 @@
                assemble_forward_llc(m_rlc.block(index));
        }

-       /* Check CV of last frame in buffer */
+       /* Last frame in buffer: */
+       block = m_rlc.block(m_window.mod_sns(m_window.v_r() - 1));
+       rdbi = &block->block_info;
+
+       /* Check if we already received all data TBF had to send: */
        if (this->state_is(GPRS_RLCMAC_FLOW) /* still in flow state */
         && this->m_window.v_q() == this->m_window.v_r()) { /* if complete */
-               struct gprs_rlc_data *block =
-                       m_rlc.block(m_window.mod_sns(m_window.v_r() - 1));
-               const struct gprs_rlc_data_block_info *rdbi =
-                       &block->block_info;
-
                LOGPTBFUL(this, LOGL_DEBUG,
                          "No gaps in received block, last block: BSN=%d 
CV=%d\n",
                          rdbi->bsn, rdbi->cv);
@@ -351,13 +351,13 @@

        /* If TLLI is included or if we received half of the window, we send
         * an ack/nack */
-       maybe_schedule_uplink_acknack(rlc);
+       maybe_schedule_uplink_acknack(rlc, rdbi->cv == 0);

        return 0;
 }

 void gprs_rlcmac_ul_tbf::maybe_schedule_uplink_acknack(
-       const gprs_rlc_data_info *rlc)
+       const gprs_rlc_data_info *rlc, bool countdown_finished)
 {
        bool require_ack = false;
        bool have_ti = rlc->block_info[0].ti ||
@@ -373,10 +373,14 @@
                LOGPTBFUL(this, LOGL_DEBUG,
                          "Scheduling Ack/Nack, because TLLI is included.\n");
        }
-       if (state_is(GPRS_RLCMAC_FINISHED)) {
+       if (countdown_finished) {
                require_ack = true;
-               LOGPTBFUL(this, LOGL_DEBUG,
-                         "Scheduling final Ack/Nack, because all data was 
received and last block has CV==0.\n");
+               if (state_is(GPRS_RLCMAC_FLOW))
+                       LOGPTBFUL(this, LOGL_DEBUG,
+                                 "Scheduling Ack/Nack, because some data is 
missing and last block has CV==0.\n");
+               else if (state_is(GPRS_RLCMAC_FINISHED))
+                       LOGPTBFUL(this, LOGL_DEBUG,
+                                 "Scheduling final Ack/Nack, because all data 
was received and last block has CV==0.\n");
        }
        if ((m_rx_counter % SEND_ACK_AFTER_FRAMES) == 0) {
                require_ack = true;
diff --git a/src/tbf_ul.h b/src/tbf_ul.h
index 85da4f6..c6df0cd 100644
--- a/src/tbf_ul.h
+++ b/src/tbf_ul.h
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@

 #ifdef __cplusplus

+#include <stdbool.h>
+
 #include "tbf.h"
 /*
  * TBF instance
@@ -97,7 +99,7 @@
        struct rate_ctr_group *m_ul_egprs_ctrs;

 protected:
-       void maybe_schedule_uplink_acknack(const gprs_rlc_data_info *rlc);
+       void maybe_schedule_uplink_acknack(const gprs_rlc_data_info *rlc, bool 
countdown_finished);

        /* Please note that all variables below will be reset when changing
         * from WAIT RELEASE back to FLOW state (re-use of TBF).
diff --git a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp
index 36f9ced..3f2925a 100644
--- a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp
+++ b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp
@@ -1459,6 +1459,7 @@

        pdch = &the_bts->bts_data()->trx[trx_no].pdch[ts_no];
        pdch->rcv_block(&data[0], sizeof(data), *fn, &meas);
+       ul_tbf->create_ul_ack(*fn, ts_no);

        request_dl_rlc_block(ul_tbf, fn);

diff --git a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
index a1530c1..57787c5 100644
--- a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
+++ b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
@@ -7193,6 +7193,9 @@
 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW EGPRS) Got MCS-4 RLC data block: 
CV=0, BSN=64, SPB=0, PI=0, E=1, TI=0, bitoffs=33
 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW EGPRS) BSN 64 storing in window 
(1..192)
 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW EGPRS) data_length=44, data=80 95 
95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 
95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
+TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW EGPRS) Scheduling Ack/Nack, 
because some data is missing and last block has CV==0.
+TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW EGPRS) changes UL ACK state from 
GPRS_RLCMAC_UL_ACK_NONE to GPRS_RLCMAC_UL_ACK_SEND_ACK
+TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW EGPRS) changes UL ACK state from 
GPRS_RLCMAC_UL_ACK_SEND_ACK to GPRS_RLCMAC_UL_ACK_NONE
 Received RTS for PDCH: TRX=0 TS=7 FN=2654279 block_nr=10 scheduling USF=0 for 
required uplink resource of UL TFI=0
 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN EGPRS) start Packet Downlink 
Assignment (PACCH)
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ TX : Packet Downlink Assignment 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/18323
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9b4ef7b7277efa645bdb5becf2e9f6b32c99a9b1
Gerrit-Change-Number: 18323
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vadim Yanitskiy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged

Reply via email to