Dear Kostas
Thanks for your review. I fixed the expression of for loop.
Could you review the branch again?
Best Regard
Tetsuo
2020年12月28日(月) 1:35 Konstantinos Poulios <logar...@googlemail.com>:
> Dear Tetsuo,
>
> Thanks for the quick action. Is there any programmatic reason for writing
> for (const auto &val : s)
> for (size_type j=0; j < val.dim()+1; ++j)
> size += int(sizeof(int));
> instead of
> size += int(s.size()*(val.dim()+1)*sizeof(int));
> ?
>
> If not, I would recommend avoiding redundant loops.
>
> Best regards
> Kostas
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 12:18 PM Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Kostas
>>
>> Thank you for reporting the bug of export_to_vtu.It is the error of
>> write_dataset_ method.
>> I fixed it in the devel-tetsuo-fix-export-vtu branch.
>> Could you merge it?
>> I also fixed the error of exporting in the Slice object.
>> All I checked about this method is in
>> ./interface/tests/python/check_export_vtu.py.
>> Sorry for my bug.
>>
>> Best Regard Tetsuo
>>
>> 2020年12月27日(日) 8:00 Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Dear Kostas
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your example.
>>> And thank you for reporting about vtu exporting.
>>> I could reproduce the message.
>>> I will check why it happens.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Tetsuo
>>>
>>> 2020年12月27日(日) 6:22 Konstantinos Poulios <logar...@googlemail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Dear Tetsuo
>>>>
>>>> I have recently uploaded an example with an axisymmetric uniaxial
>>>> tension simulation under the contrib folder. You can try it if you like. By
>>>> the way I have also noticed that when I use your vtu export functions,
>>>> instead of vtk, in that file, I get a corrupted vtu output. Paraview
>>>> complains with:
>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>> Maybe you could check that as well.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Kostas
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 5:44 AM Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Kostas
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your email.
>>>>> I was impressed that GWFL can do it. I will try it.
>>>>> And I was also impressed that we can express hyperelastic material.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Tetsuo
>>>>>
>>>>> 2020年12月17日(木) 22:16 Konstantinos Poulios <logar...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Tetsuo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GWFL can do this. Here is an example of modelling a hyperelastic
>>>>>> material in an axisymmetric problem:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> md.add_initialized_data("K", E/(3.*(1.-2.*nu))) # Bulk modulus
>>>>>> md.add_initialized_data("mu", E/(2*(1+nu))) # Shear modulus
>>>>>> md.add_macro("F", "Id(2)+Grad_u")
>>>>>> #md.add_macro("F3d",
>>>>>> "[1+Grad_u(1,1),Grad_u(1,2),0;Grad_u(2,1),1+Grad_u(2,2),0;0,0,1]")
>>>>>> md.add_macro("F3d",
>>>>>> "Id(3)+[0,0,0;0,0,0;0,0,1/X(1)]*u(1)+[1,0;0,1;0,0]*Grad_u*[1,0,0;0,1,0]")
>>>>>> md.add_macro("J", "Det(F)*(1+u(1)/X(1))")
>>>>>> md.add_macro("devlogbe", "Deviator(Logm(Left_Cauchy_Green(F3d)))")
>>>>>> md.add_macro("tauH", "K*log(J)")
>>>>>> md.add_nonlinear_generic_assembly_brick(mim,
>>>>>> "2*pi*X(1)*((tauH*Id(2)+tauD2d):(Grad_Test_u*Inv(F))+(tauH+tauD33)/(X(1)+u(1))*Test_u(1))")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you try if this works for you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>> Kostas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:09 AM Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear getfem users.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Excuse me for my frequent questions.
>>>>>>> I would like to solve the problem of axisymmetric elements in
>>>>>>> cylindrical coordinate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tried to use a GWFL to simulate a two-dimensional mesh as a mesh
>>>>>>> of axisymmetric elements, but I couldn't. As you know, Grad and Div are
>>>>>>> different for cartesian coordinate and cylindrical coordinate systems.
>>>>>>> Is there a good way to solve this problem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best Tetsuo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
