Sorry, gmail handles quoting a bit differntly from my last email provider..
It's a bit confusing some times...
And you're right you didn't patronize him, but charles did.. but apperantly
with good reasons.. or something....

Maarten


On 07/05/06, Norman Palardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On May 07, 2006, at 2:47 AM, Maarten de Vries wrote:

> Well, the point is you did bother replying to his email, just not in a
> helpful way. Maybe you don't want to help him, well, fine. But then
> let
> someone else do it and don't go patronizing someone who asks a stupid
> question.
>
> Maarten

Careful how you quote things Maarten.
The way you originally quoted that made it look like Terry replied with

>>> Been there and been trying for ... years ... literally.
>>> It's why I don't even bother to reply to Brian's requests any more.

when in fact it was me. (it should be more like below)

I replied to your email, not Brian's, and I did not patronize anyone.
I just said that Charles, myself and numerous others have tried to
help Brian out before and that now I simply refrain.

> On May 06, 2006, at 5:04 PM, Terry Ford wrote:
>>
>> On May 6, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On May 06, 2006, at 3:46 PM, Maarten de Vries wrote:
>>>
>>>> Charles, if you're just gonna site here and say "go understand
>>>> it" he isn't
>>>> going to. You got to make him understand it.
>>>
>>> Been there and been trying for ... years ... literally.
>>> It's why I don't even bother to reply to Brian's requests any more.
>>
>> Don't discourage Maarten. Let him find out for himself. ;-)
>>
>> Terry
>


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to