Kim-Ee, The updated fib-analyse report from a few hours ago is posted here: https://gist.github.com/leroux/6725810#file-headvordnub-analysis-L2988 Comment (http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8173#comment:9)
Sorry for the misunderstanding. Muhaimin On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Kim-Ee Yeoh <k...@atamo.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:14 PM, GHC <ghc-devs@haskell.org> wrote: > A 5% improvement in compile time is remarkable, if it's true. Great! But > I'm always worried about the noise in compile times measured in seconds. > > Does anyone else think the noise in runtimes is alarming considering that the > following is the fib-analysis of /binary-identical/ programs? > > > Min -0.1% -0.0% -25.4% -32.2% -1.3% > > Max +0.1% +0.0% +19.0% +22.2% +10.0% > > Shouldn't we find an explanation for this before believing the compile time > numbers? What would cause these wide swings on the benchmarking machine? > > p.s. For the record: Should do more rigorous statistical testing instead of > naive percentages, yes? > > -- Kim-Ee > _______________________________________________ > ghc-tickets mailing list > ghc-tick...@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-tickets
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
