ghc-devs  

Messages by Thread

• linting GHC Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: linting GHC Hécate
• Compiling libraries Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: Compiling libraries Carter Schonwald
  • Re: Compiling libraries Artem Pelenitsyn
  • Re: Compiling libraries Carter Schonwald
  • Re: Compiling libraries Ben Gamari
• [ANNOUNCE] Experimental Windows GHC 8.10.5 binary release. Supports Haskell DLLs. kyra via ghc-devs
• simple Haskell help needed on #19746 Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: simple Haskell help needed on #19746 Sebastian Graf
  • Re: simple Haskell help needed on #19746 Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: simple Haskell help needed on #19746 Iavor Diatchki
  • Re: simple Haskell help needed on #19746 Iavor Diatchki
• [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.1-alpha2 released Ben Gamari
• magicDict Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: magicDict Spiwack, Arnaud
  • Re: magicDict Krzysztof Gogolewski
  • Re: magicDict Edward Kmett
  • RE: magicDict Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: magicDict Spiwack, Arnaud
  • Re: magicDict Carter Schonwald
  • Re: magicDict Edward Kmett
  • Re: magicDict Spiwack, Arnaud
  • RE: magicDict Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: magicDict Krzysztof Gogolewski
  • RE: magicDict Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: magicDict Edward Kmett
  • RE: magicDict Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: magicDict Edward Kmett
• Integrating more base Instances in the `stock` deriving strategy? Hécate
• instance {Semigroup, Monoid} (Bag a) ? Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: instance {Semigroup, Monoid} (Bag a) ? Alan & Kim Zimmerman
  • Re: instance {Semigroup, Monoid} (Bag a) ? Sebastian Graf
  • Re: instance {Semigroup, Monoid} (Bag a) ? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: instance {Semigroup, Monoid} (Bag a) ? chessai
  • Re: instance {Semigroup, Monoid} (Bag a) ? Ben Gamari
  • Re: instance {Semigroup, Monoid} (Bag a) ? Ben Gamari
  • Re: instance {Semigroup, Monoid} (Bag a) ? Alfredo Di Napoli
• What's the modern way to apply a polymorphic function to a Dynamic value in GHC 8.8 and onwards? YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: What's the modern way to apply a polymorphic function to a Dynamic value in GHC 8.8 and onwards? Vladislav Zavialov
  • Re: What's the modern way to apply a polymorphic function to a Dynamic value in GHC 8.8 and onwards? YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: What's the modern way to apply a polymorphic function to a Dynamic value in GHC 8.8 and onwards? Erik Hesselink
  • Re: What's the modern way to apply a polymorphic function to a Dynamic value in GHC 8.8 and onwards? YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: What's the modern way to apply a polymorphic function to a Dynamic value in GHC 8.8 and onwards? YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: What's the modern way to apply a polymorphic function to a Dynamic value in GHC 8.8 and onwards? Erik Hesselink
  • Re: What's the modern way to apply a polymorphic function to a Dynamic value in GHC 8.8 and onwards? YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: What's the modern way to apply a polymorphic function to a Dynamic value in GHC 8.8 and onwards? YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: What's the modern way to apply a polymorphic function to a Dynamic value in GHC 8.8 and onwards? chessai
• External STG Interpreter blog post Csaba Hruska
  • RE: External STG Interpreter blog post Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: External STG Interpreter blog post John Ericson
  • Re: External STG Interpreter blog post Csaba Hruska
  • Re: External STG Interpreter blog post John Ericson
• How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: [Haskell-cafe] How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency Henning Thielemann
  • Re: [Haskell-cafe] How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: [Haskell-cafe] How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency Henning Thielemann
  • Re: [Haskell-cafe] How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: [Haskell-cafe] How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency Henning Thielemann
  • Re: [Haskell-cafe] How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency YueCompl via ghc-devs
  • Re: How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: How to ensure optimization for large immutable vectors to be shared w.r.t. Referential Transparency Viktor Dukhovni
• Newcomer looking for help with changes to kind system Shant Hairapetian
  • Re: Newcomer looking for help with changes to kind system Ben Gamari
  • Re: Newcomer looking for help with changes to kind system Shant Hairapetian
  • Re: Newcomer looking for help with changes to kind system Ben Gamari
  • Re: Newcomer looking for help with changes to kind system Shant Hairapetian
• How does GHC implement layout? Alexis King
  • Re: How does GHC implement layout? Iavor Diatchki
  • Re: How does GHC implement layout? Alexis King
  • Re: How does GHC implement layout? Sebastian Graf
  • Re: How does GHC implement layout? Carter Schonwald
  • Re: How does GHC implement layout? Ian Lynagh
  • Re: How does GHC implement layout? Ian Lynagh
  • Re: How does GHC implement layout? Alexis King
  • Re: How does GHC implement layout? Simon Marlow
• GHC Proposal: GHC Maintainer Preview Hécate
• Error and Warning Messages practical migration guidelines Alfredo Di Napoli
• [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.1-alpha1 now available Ben Gamari
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.1-alpha1 now available Phyx
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.1-alpha1 now available Ben Gamari
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.1-alpha1 now available George Colpitts
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.1-alpha1 now available Ben Gamari
• Multiple versions of happy Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: Multiple versions of happy Sebastian Graf
  • RE: Multiple versions of happy Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: Multiple versions of happy Oleg Grenrus
• Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? Alfredo Di Napoli
  • RE: Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? Alfredo Di Napoli
  • Re: Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? Alfredo Di Napoli
  • Re: Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? John Ericson
  • Re: Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? Alfredo Di Napoli
  • Re: Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? Alfredo Di Napoli
  • Re: Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? John Ericson
  • Re: Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? Alfredo Di Napoli
  • Re: Why TcLclEnv and DsGblEnv need to store the same IORef for errors? John Ericson
• GHC 9.2 has branched Ben Gamari
• config.sub Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: config.sub Simon Jakobi via ghc-devs
• HLint in the GHC CI, an eight-months retrospective Hécate
  • Re: HLint in the GHC CI, an eight-months retrospective Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: HLint in the GHC CI, an eight-months retrospective Hécate
• Options for targeting Windows XP? Clinton Mead
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Carter Schonwald
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Phyx
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Ben Gamari
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Clinton Mead
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Clinton Mead
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Ben Gamari
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Ben Gamari
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Clinton Mead
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Moritz Angermann
  • RE: Options for targeting Windows XP? Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Javier Neira Sanchez
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? amindfv--- via ghc-devs
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Ben Gamari
  • Re: Options for targeting Windows XP? Moritz Angermann
• Call for Talks: Haskell Implementors' Workshop Ningning Xie
• GHC 8.10 backports? Moritz Angermann
  • Re: GHC 8.10 backports? Gergő Érdi
  • Re: GHC 8.10 backports? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: GHC 8.10 backports? Gergő Érdi
  • Re: GHC 8.10 backports? Moritz Angermann
  • Re: GHC 8.10 backports? Andreas Klebinger
  • Re: GHC 8.10 backports? Moritz Angermann
  • Re: GHC 8.10 backports? Phyx
  • Re: GHC 8.10 backports? Moritz Angermann
• Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Alexis King
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Sebastian Graf
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Sebastian Graf
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Alexis King
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Sebastian Graf
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Carter Schonwald
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Viktor Dukhovni
  • RE: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Richard Eisenberg
  • RE: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Alexis King
  • RE: Type inference of singular matches on GADTs Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
• Post-mortem for last-night's GitLab outage Ben Gamari
• GitLab is down: urgent Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Spiwack, Arnaud
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Ben Gamari
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Ben Gamari
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Giorgio Marinelli
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent davean
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent howard . b . golden
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Richard Eisenberg
  • Configuration documentation (Was Re: GitLab is down: urgent) howard . b . golden
  • Re: Configuration documentation (Was Re: GitLab is down: urgent) Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: Configuration documentation (Was Re: GitLab is down: urgent) howard . b . golden
  • Re: Configuration documentation (Was Re: GitLab is down: urgent) Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: Configuration documentation (Was Re: GitLab is down: urgent) Gershom B
  • Re: Configuration documentation (Was Re: GitLab is down: urgent) Tom Ellis
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Moritz Angermann
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Giorgio Marinelli
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Moritz Angermann
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Ben Gamari
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Moritz Angermann
  • Re: GitLab is down: urgent Moritz Angermann
• GitLab upgrade soon Ben Gamari
  • Re: GitLab upgrade soon Ben Gamari
  • Re: GitLab upgrade soon Giorgio Marinelli
• Pull request to editline Oleg Grenrus
  • Re: Pull request to editline Judah Jacobson
  • Re: Pull request to editline Oleg Grenrus
• Is referring to GHC-proposals in GHC user manual bad practice or not? Oleg Grenrus
  • Re: Is referring to GHC-proposals in GHC user manual bad practice or not? Oleg Grenrus
  • Re: Is referring to GHC-proposals in GHC user manual bad practice or not? Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: Is referring to GHC-proposals in GHC user manual bad practice or not? Brandon Allbery
  • Re: Is referring to GHC-proposals in GHC user manual bad practice or not? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Is referring to GHC-proposals in GHC user manual bad practice or not? Oleg Grenrus
  • Re: Is referring to GHC-proposals in GHC user manual bad practice or not? Richard Eisenberg
  • Re: Is referring to GHC-proposals in GHC user manual bad practice or not? Ben Gamari
• Generalising KnowNat/Char/Symbol? Sylvain Henry
  • Re: Generalising KnowNat/Char/Symbol? Iavor Diatchki
  • Re: Generalising KnowNat/Char/Symbol? Oleg Grenrus
• Build failure -- missing dependency? Help! Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: Build failure -- missing dependency? Help! Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Build failure -- missing dependency? Help! Sylvain Henry
  • RE: Build failure -- missing dependency? Help! Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
  • Re: Build failure -- missing dependency? Help! Sylvain Henry
  • Re: Build failure -- missing dependency? Help! Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Build failure -- missing dependency? Help! Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Build failure -- missing dependency? Help! Moritz Angermann
• GSOC Idea: Bytecode serialization and/or Fat Interface files Zubin Duggal
  • Re: GSOC Idea: Bytecode serialization and/or Fat Interface files Cheng Shao
  • Re: GSOC Idea: Bytecode serialization and/or Fat Interface files Moritz Angermann
  • Re: GSOC Idea: Bytecode serialization and/or Fat Interface files John Ericson
  • Re: GSOC Idea: Bytecode serialization and/or Fat Interface files Moritz Angermann

• Earlier messages
• Later messages