Manuel M T Chakravarty <c...@cse.unsw.edu.au> writes: > The way I see it, the main cost of keeping DPH around is to handle > breakages such as that with vector. I can’t promise to address those > in a timely manner, which is why I agreed to disable/remove DPH. > > However, as Geoff stepped forward, this issue is solved. As for the > overhead in compile time etc, I don’t think, it is that much of a > deal. During development, most compiles runs are incremental anyway. > Judging by the VCS history it seems that nothing happened in response to this thread. Geoff, do you see yourself having time to pick this up in the near future?
If not, perhaps we should pick up this matter again and seriously consider parking this code in a branch until someone is able to pick it up again. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
