On 2016-01-22 at 17:23:18 +0100, Geoffrey Mainland wrote: > I didn't mean to suggest that DPH should be part of every build, just > that it should be part of *some* regular build. > > If we're willing to do that, then I'm certainly willing to get DPH > back up and running.
What's the situation with the `vector`/`primitive` packages if DPH is to be resuscitated? Does the official `vector` package need to be made DPH-aware? _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
