On 23 January 2016 at 18:16, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > On 2016-01-23 at 17:58:12 +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > > [...] > > > My suggestion, and what I'd expect, is to make Shake part of GHC's > > included lib, just like process or xhtml. > > please don't; the only reason we include process and xhtml because > we *have* to. The less we *have* to bundle, the better.
If there's a good way in 8.x (with new Cabal and Shake) to avoid bundling, while using Shake for ghc --make, then I'm all for it. My concern is that it has to be as simple as it's currently to install ghc on a random Linux distro, in order for someone to use a Shakefile. I want more Shakefile users :). _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs