Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.a...@gmail.com> writes: > On 23 January 2016 at 18:16, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > >> On 2016-01-23 at 17:58:12 +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> > My suggestion, and what I'd expect, is to make Shake part of GHC's >> > included lib, just like process or xhtml. >> >> please don't; the only reason we include process and xhtml because >> we *have* to. The less we *have* to bundle, the better. > > If there's a good way in 8.x (with new Cabal and Shake) to avoid > bundling, while using Shake for ghc --make, then I'm all for it. My > concern is that it has to be as simple as it's currently to install > ghc on a random Linux distro, in order for someone to use a Shakefile. > I want more Shakefile users :).
I'm not sure I follow. Edward's --make support is a front-end plugin; as far as I know there has been no discussion of shipping it with GHC-proper. It merely makes use of the new front-end plugin facility. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something here? Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
