Hi,
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2016, 09:22 +0200 schrieb Roman Cheplyaka:
> On 02/05/2016 01:31 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
> > I'm not really sure how you would change the type of 'id' based on
> > a language pragma.
> >
> > How do people feel about a cosmetic fix, where we introduce a new
> > pragma, {-# LANGUAGE ShowLevity #-} which controls the display of
> > levity
> > arguments/TYPE. It's off by default but gets turned on by some
> > extensions like MagicHash (i.e. we only show levity if you have
> > enabled extensions where the distinction matters).
>
> Yes, I am surprised this isn't the way it's been done. The levity
> arguments should totally be hidden unless requested explicitly.
>
> I'd only expect this to be a ghc flag (-fshow-levity), not a language
> pragma, since it should only affect the way types are /shown/.shouldn’t this already happen, based on -fprint-explicit-kinds? At least I would have expected this. So we probably either want to make sure that -fno-print-explicit-kinds also prevents forall’ed kind variables, or add a new flag of that (heh) kind. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
