2016-02-16 10:56 GMT+01:00 Herbert Valerio Riedel <[email protected]>:
> [...] but `sig(nature)s` has a precedent, so using `-sigs` wouldn't > introduce anything new. > I'm fine with "sigs", my point was only the fact that non-abbreviated words seem to be much more common in the flags names (and are easier to remember). IMHO it doesn't really matter if the flag names are long: One probably doesn't type them on the command line often, they typically live in .cabal files, .travis.yml and pragmas where you type them once. Well... the -Wnoncanonical-*-instances flag family was the best I could > come up with which is reasonably self-descriptive... do you have any > better suggestions? > No, and I actually like the long names, see above. :-) > Fwiw, `ghc --show-options | grep binding` come ups empty > Then the docs are out-of-sync: http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/master/users-guide/using-warnings.html#ghc-flag--Wlazy-unlifted-bindings
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
