Páli Gábor János <pali.ga...@gmail.com> writes: > 2016-05-13 7:58 GMT+02:00 Páli Gábor János <pali.ga...@gmail.com>: >> 2016-05-13 7:55 GMT+02:00 Páli Gábor János <pali.ga...@gmail.com>: >>> That is probably because FreeBSD has GNU make(1) as `gmake`, it should >>> be invoked with that name. I suspect that, for some reason (which is >>> unknown to me), the value of the $(MAKE) variable is not respected at >>> the recursive invocation of make(1). > [..] >> Ohh, I was quick to surrender: all you have to do is to >> s/make/$(MAKE)/ in line 22 at utils/haddock/doc/ghc.mk. > > All right, everything is now filed as #12058.
Thanks Páli! This should now be fixed on the ghc-8.0 branch. The question how is what should be done about for the 8.0.1 release. It seems that there are two decisions to be made here, 1. Do we cut a new source tarball and bump the tag? 2. If so, do we throw out the existing binary distributions? The pragmatist in me wants to answer 1) yes, 2) no, although I do dislike the idea of distributing binaries that weren't derived from the associated source tarball. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
