David Feuer <david.fe...@gmail.com> writes: > Not really. It's really just the newtype optimization, although it's not a > newtype.
Ahh, I see. Yes, you are right. I was being silly. However, in this case wouldn't it make more sense to just call it a newtype? Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
