Given the prevalence of spellings like "normalise" in common Haskell packages, we might just be settling on British English. Being American makes that a tad difficult on my end, but personally I can make peace with it.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Pickering < matthewtpicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also like 'bespoke' but then it seems to be a much more common in > British English than American English. > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ryan Scott <ryan.gl.sc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Bardur, > > > > Since you don't like "bespoke", would you mind suggesting an > > alternative, or advocating for a previously mentioned idea? From [1], > > the ideas I've seen tossed around are: > > > > * builtin > > * standard (Elliot Cameron suggested it here [2]) > > * wiredin (Cater Schonwald suggested it here [3]) > > * magic (Andres Löh suggested it here [4]) > > * native > > * original > > * specialized (the above three are ad hoc suggestions I came up with in > a hurry) > > > > Ryan S. > > ----- > > [1] https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Compiler/ > DerivingStrategies#Alternativesyntax > > [2] https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2016-July/012448.html > > [3] https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2016-July/012450.html > > [4] https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2016-July/012453.html > > _______________________________________________ > > ghc-devs mailing list > > ghc-devs@haskell.org > > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
