Yuras Shumovich wrote: >> Can we generalize the proposal such that subsequent imports shadow >> preceding ones?
Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > ...iirc there is a different idea... > allowing explicitly enumerated names... > to shadow imports from other modules which didn't explicitly name the > same import; effectively introducing a higher-priority scope for names > imported explicitly. Conversely - the original proposal should be modified to remain an error, not a warning, when the symbol was imported explicitly on an import list and then redefined locally at the top level. This is equivalent to defining a symbol twice in the same scope. Thanks, Yitz _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
