On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Michael Sloan <mgsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What if instead we re-framed this as a "top-level where clause", like this:
>
> main :: IO ()
> main = putStrLn ("Hi" <> "There")
>
> other-function :: IO ()
> other-function = putStrLn ("I can " <> "also use it")
>
> -- NOTE: 0 indent!
>
> where
> (<>) :: String -> String -> String
> (<>) = (++)
>
This would actually be slightly odd parse-wise, as we're already *in* an
unindented where clause (module ... where)
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
