ÉRDI Gergő <ge...@erdi.hu> writes: > Hi, > > I'm seeing three build failures in CI: > Hi,
> 1. On perf-nofib, it fails with: > Don't worry about this one for the moment. This job is marked as accepting of failure for a reason (hence the job state being an orange exclamation mark rather than a red X). > == make boot -j --jobserver-fds=3,4 --no-print-directory; > in /builds/cactus/ghc/nofib/real/smallpt > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > /builds/cactus/ghc/ghc/bin/ghc -M -dep-suffix "" -dep-makefile .depend > -osuf o -O2 -Wno-tabs -Rghc-timing -H32m -hisuf hi -packageunboxed-ref > -rtsopts smallpt.hs > <command line>: cannot satisfy -package unboxed-ref > (use -v for more information) > > (e.g. https://gitlab.haskell.org/cactus/ghc/-/jobs/743141#L1465) > > 2. On validate-x86_64-darwin, pretty much every test fails because of the > following extra stderr output: > > + > +<no location info>: > + warning: Couldn't figure out C compiler information! > + Make sure you're using GNU gcc, or clang > > (e.g. https://gitlab.haskell.org/cactus/ghc/-/jobs/743129#L3655) > Yes, this will be fixed by !6162 once I get it passing CI. > 3. On validate-x86_64-linux-deb9-integer-simple, T11545 fails on memory > consumption: > > Unexpected stat failures: > perf/compiler/T11545.run T11545 [stat decreased from > x86_64-linux-deb9-integer-simple-validate baseline @ > 5f3991c7cab8ccc9ab8daeebbfce57afbd9acc33] (normal) > This test appears to be quite sensitive to environment. I suspect we should further increase its acceptance window to avoid this sort of spurious failure. Cheers, Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
