Thanks, this is all great news On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 21:56 Ben Gamari <b...@smart-cactus.org> wrote:
> ÉRDI Gergő <ge...@erdi.hu> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm seeing three build failures in CI: > > > Hi, > > > 1. On perf-nofib, it fails with: > > > Don't worry about this one for the moment. This job is marked as > accepting of failure for a reason (hence the job state being an orange > exclamation mark rather than a red X). > > > == make boot -j --jobserver-fds=3,4 --no-print-directory; > > in /builds/cactus/ghc/nofib/real/smallpt > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > /builds/cactus/ghc/ghc/bin/ghc -M -dep-suffix "" -dep-makefile .depend > > -osuf o -O2 -Wno-tabs -Rghc-timing -H32m -hisuf hi > -packageunboxed-ref > > -rtsopts smallpt.hs > > <command line>: cannot satisfy -package unboxed-ref > > (use -v for more information) > > > > (e.g. https://gitlab.haskell.org/cactus/ghc/-/jobs/743141#L1465) > > > > 2. On validate-x86_64-darwin, pretty much every test fails because of > the > > following extra stderr output: > > > > + > > +<no location info>: > > + warning: Couldn't figure out C compiler information! > > + Make sure you're using GNU gcc, or clang > > > > (e.g. https://gitlab.haskell.org/cactus/ghc/-/jobs/743129#L3655) > > > Yes, this will be fixed by !6162 once I get it passing CI. > > > 3. On validate-x86_64-linux-deb9-integer-simple, T11545 fails on memory > > consumption: > > > > Unexpected stat failures: > > perf/compiler/T11545.run T11545 [stat decreased from > x86_64-linux-deb9-integer-simple-validate baseline @ > > 5f3991c7cab8ccc9ab8daeebbfce57afbd9acc33] (normal) > > > This test appears to be quite sensitive to environment. I suspect we > should further increase its acceptance window to avoid this sort of > spurious failure. > > Cheers, > > Cheers, > > - Ben >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
