On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 04:24:53PM +0300, Wolfgang Jeltsch via ghc-devs wrote: > I sense that the text has notably moved towards the “pro-LLM” side. > Sometimes this led to outright wrong statements, like the following: > > > If you carefully review and understand every line of code or > > documentation produced with LLM assistance, revise it where necessary, > > and take full responsibility for every line, that constitutes human > > authorship. > > No, it doesn’t. An author is a person who *created* the work. If the > work was assembled by an LLM, based on only guidelines by the person in > question, then said person acted only as a reviewer, not as an author.
Would it help if the text were changed to "... that constitutes human authorship for the purposes of this policy." ? That is, make it clear the policy is not trying to define a general notion of "human authorship" but rather specify when a submission meets a particular criterion relevant to contributing to GHC? Tom _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
