Hello folks! The policy looks welcoming to me in general, and I don't anticipate major impediments to my contributions.
> You must understand, and be able to explain, every line of code, and every sentence of documentation. It could help making explicit that this is required of MRs that are ready to review. When preparing a patch, and asking for help, it could make sense to share work in progress. Also, the text mentions "Recommendation P4" where perhaps it means R1. Cheers! Facundo On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 5:16 AM Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs < [email protected]> wrote: > Friends > > There has been a lot of discussion about GHC's LLM policy on this GHC > thread > <https://mailman.haskell.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/ZTHFWO4R4D5SKC2ZSMOG57K6JIAQ7CPC/> > . > > I have made quite few revisions in the light of this and other > conversations. Here is the draft again > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XxP8NXnbgr6faxXBXKw75zgoxIg-SzGv-Cvixyi-SH8/edit?usp=sharing>, > I hope in a close to final form. Any final thoughts? > > thanks > > Simon > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- All views and opinions expressed in this email message are the personal opinions of the author and do not represent those of the organization or its customers.
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
