Moritz, your LLM-generated table and bullet points are almost an exact rephrase of your previous email's points about Windows vs. Linux. Let's try to "disagree agreeably." I don't think it's helpful for me to rephrase my responses as well.
> On 07/25/2026 1:38 PM CEST Moritz Angermann <[email protected]> > wrote: > At that point we are no longer talking about provenance. We are expressing an > institutional preference between otherwise acceptable workflows. "Otherwise acceptable" is, of course, the point of discussion here. > If you believe the analogy fails, I would genuinely appreciate it if you > could point out where this structural correspondence breaks down. I suspect > that would help me understand your position much better. If you search this email thread for the word "emacs," you can find other people explaining why they find the analogy unhelpful. To one person's response you wrote "Here we disagree; but this would likely end up splitting hairs [...] and I have no interest in debating that." So let's agree to disagree! Thanks, Tom _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
