Tom, your latest reply helped me understand something I hadn’t appreciated before.
When I wrote “otherwise acceptable workflows,” you replied that this is exactly the point under discussion. > "Otherwise acceptable" is, of course, the point of discussion here. Does that mean that, in your view, LLM-assisted authorship is *not* an otherwise acceptable workflow, even when the contributor satisfies all of the policy’s requirements around disclosure, understanding, responsibility, and quality? If so, I think I finally understand why we have been talking past each other. In that case, the disclosure requirement is no longer merely about provenance; it identifies contributions produced by a workflow that the project itself does not regard as fully acceptable. Best, Moritz On Sun, Jul 26, 2026 at 6:31 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Moritz, your LLM-generated table and bullet points are almost an exact > rephrase of your previous email's points about Windows vs. Linux. Let's try > to "disagree agreeably." I don't think it's helpful for me to rephrase my > responses as well. > > > On 07/25/2026 1:38 PM CEST Moritz Angermann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > At that point we are no longer talking about provenance. We are > expressing an institutional preference between otherwise acceptable > workflows. > > "Otherwise acceptable" is, of course, the point of discussion here. > > > If you believe the analogy fails, I would genuinely appreciate it if you > could point out where this structural correspondence breaks down. I suspect > that would help me understand your position much better. > > If you search this email thread for the word "emacs," you can find other > people explaining why they find the analogy unhelpful. To one person's > response you wrote "Here we disagree; but this would likely end up > splitting hairs [...] and I have no interest in debating that." So let's > agree to disagree! > > Thanks, > Tom >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
