In an attempt to steer this discussion back in a constructive direction, I would like to state that I don't think we should always adopt new technologies or services without careful consideration. This seems to directly contradict the main argument of the people who are in favor of LLM use, which is that they want to be free to use whatever "tools" they want.
Besides that argument, the only argument I've heard is that LLM use gives people the feeling of being more productive. But this has not been backed up with "hard evidence", let alone under the requirement of "carefully reviewing and understanding every line generated by an LLM". I doubt anyone can really achieve a worthwhile productivity gain compared to limiting LLM use to: prototyping, high level design, asking questions, and reviewing code (uses of LLMs which are not in question). Jaro _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
