Am Mo 03.08.2026 11:11 schrieb Damian: > Moritz Angermann wrote: > > This also seems to be reflecting in the LLM policies we see emerging: > > > > 1. corporations seem to make the judgement call that values LLM use > > above legal risks. And I think they generally have their own > > legal counsel involved in these decisions. In many corporate > > settings the use of LLMs seems to be permissible at this point. > > Restrictions on LLM providers may exist, and some providers offer > > indemnification in their enterprise offerings. > > > > 2. Permissive projects seem to be more relaxed in their LLM policies > > and mostly focus on the project's culture without being overly > > prescriptive. Generally seemingly leaning towards human > > authorship. > > > > 3. copyleft projects feeling the need to protect their purity to > > continue upholding their license claims going forward. > > Before we go too far in that direction, what's your Bar ID?
Come on. Moritz was merely writing about typical approaches to LLM use in different settings, speculating about the reasons for choosing these approaches. He was not even making any hard claims about whether these reasons would be valid. Generally, I’d welcome if you wouldn’t tell people to not write certain things based on them not being legal experts, in particular since you’ve already made a wrong statement on a legal matter in this discussion, while at the same time stressing your experience with legal issues. All the best, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
