On 28/06/11 4:32 PM, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> You are right -- the test case I posted was made too hastily, is broken,
> and doesn't demonstrate any GHDL misbehavior. Sorry for the wild goose
> chase.


Thanks for the response.   It took longer to write about than to do.  The
thoroughness demonstrates an attempt at responsiveness (haven't heard from
Tristan recently).

Let us know when you can point to something concrete.


_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to