On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 21:54:40 +0100 (CET) [email protected] wrote: > > Test: 375 > > ghdl -a --std=93c vhdl-93/ashenden/compliant/ch_13_fg_13_26.vhd > > vhdl-93/ashenden/compliant/ch_13_fg_13_26.vhd:33:20: port "a" > > already associated in primary binding > > vhdl-93/ashenden/compliant/ch_13_fg_13_26.vhd:33:28: port "c" > > already associated in primary binding > > vhdl-93/ashenden/compliant/ch_13_fg_13_26.vhd:33:36: port "b" > > already associated in primary binding > > vhdl-93/ashenden/compliant/ch_13_fg_13_26.vhd:33:44: port "y" > > already associated in primary binding ghdl: compilation error > > Weird, as I don't have this issue. >
Test: 375 definitely fails on FreeBSD-9.2(i386) with: $ hg branch ghdl-0.31 I think I did an "hg pull; hg update -r ghdl-0.31" around 3PM EST today and I followed the FreeBSD "-alt" [build instructions][1]. [1]: http://sourceforge.net/p/ghdl-updates/wiki/FreeBSD%20Instructions/ > > tests (?). Is there a convenient method to run all of the tests > > (regardless of failures) then generate a [comprehensive] report? > > No, but the driver (testsuite.sh) is very simple, so you can modify it > to fit your need. > Are modifications to the test [and report generation] suite something that could be shared with the community? Is perl sufficiently ubiquitous to be used in scripts or would everyone prefer to keep the dependencies simple (/bin/sh)? _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
