Hello, > On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 21:54:40 +0100 (CET) > [email protected] wrote: > > > Test: 375 > > > ghdl -a --std=93c vhdl-93/ashenden/compliant/ch_13_fg_13_26.vhd > > > vhdl-93/ashenden/compliant/ch_13_fg_13_26.vhd:33:20: port "a" > > > already associated in primary binding > > > vhdl-93/ashenden/compliant/ch_13_fg_13_26.vhd:33:28: port "c" > > > already associated in primary binding > > > vhdl-93/ashenden/compliant/ch_13_fg_13_26.vhd:33:36: port "b" > > > already associated in primary binding > > > vhdl-93/ashenden/compliant/ch_13_fg_13_26.vhd:33:44: port "y" > > > already associated in primary binding ghdl: compilation error > > > > Weird, as I don't have this issue. > > > > Test: 375 definitely fails on FreeBSD-9.2(i386) with: > > $ hg branch > ghdl-0.31 > > I think I did an "hg pull; hg update -r ghdl-0.31" around 3PM EST > today and I followed the FreeBSD "-alt" [build instructions][1]. > > [1]: > http://sourceforge.net/p/ghdl-updates/wiki/FreeBSD%20Instructions/
Interesting. I have tested with ghdl_mcode, no failure here. Maybe a mcode vs gcc issue ? > > > tests (?). Is there a convenient method to run all of the tests > > > (regardless of failures) then generate a [comprehensive] report? > > > > No, but the driver (testsuite.sh) is very simple, so you can modify > > it > > to fit your need. > > > > Are modifications to the test [and report generation] suite something > that could be shared with the community? Sure, this is an open-source project. > Is perl sufficiently > ubiquitous to be used in scripts or would everyone prefer to keep the > dependencies simple (/bin/sh)? I don't like perl, so I prefer to avoid it (and I only have a basic perl knowledge). If you need something more elaborate than sh, what about python ? To be discussed with the community. It would be nice to have a parallel run of the test suite, and for sure /bin/sh is not the right tool for that. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
