Hello,

> > > * -RC : when -stable is internally consistent, rigorous testing
> > > and
> > >   polishing can begin on a Release Candidate snapshot.
> > 
> > Clearly that would be an improvement over the last day or two :-)
> > Sorry
> > about that, folks... probably RC1 -> release will suffice for ghdl.
> 
> Maybe we should re-add the -rc in version.ads
> 
> I think there is still a couple of issues:
> * I forgot to update the doc when I updated the IEEE math packages.
>   It is fixed in the default branch, but should be ported.
> 
> * there is still one or two crashes. I think we should at least
>   merge the 256:487022c6eac1 change set.
> 
> I have to run my test suite to double check the last point. Sorry
> about
> that, I should have checked before pushing.

I have just merged the doc and CS 256. No new crashes.

So for me (using mcode), ghdl-0.31 is good.

Tristan.

_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to