Tristan wrote:
That doesn't happen on linux. In case of overflow, a fault
is generated, but there is no line/filename with that fault.
OK; that might be worth adding to the roadmap if feasible.
The bug16872 ticket shows the ghdl-gcc version as
printing the following useful message:
./bug:error: bound check failure at bug.vhd:23
This is a bound-check. They have line/filename info.
I suspect Brian Drummond's patch, to the win32.c exception code, is
actually unrelated to the missing bound-check message in Windows
ghdl-mcode.
Which would explain why I see no difference in the bug16872 results
with it applied...
-Brian
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
