On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Peter Gavin <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think ghdl doesn't like having a package body, now.  I didn't test
> putting the body in another file and analyzing it separately, though.  Any
> suggestions?
>
>
Another thing: I tested removing the reference to std_logic_1164 and
substituting a locally defined type for std_ulogic.  The file seems to
analyze successfully with those changes.

-Pete
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to