Hello, > So, in terms of priority, I would say support generic types, > packages, and subprograms first before supporting unconstrained > record elements.
Ok, I keep that in my mind. > < The main advantage of FST, VZT and other gtkwave formats is the > compression level. > /> > > > On the topic of compression, I was thinking that we could use GHW in > conjunction with compression techniques such as LZMA. I'm not saying > we should ditch the other formats (FST, VZT, HDF5) altogether; I'm > saying we could study these formats to either incorporate them into > GHDL, or improve the existing GHW format with a good compression > algorithm (which is probably the only thing GHW lags behind now?). > Or we could do both (include the other formats, and improve GHW). I think I should study a little bit FST and VZT; and maybe adapting their compression to GHW. The main issue with verilog formats (FST, VZT) is their poor typing systems. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
