On 28/02/15 19:11, Endre Bak wrote:
Hi,

Here are the files.
I have also included my results here: MyConsoleOutput.txt
  MyGhdlVersion.txt  MyGtkWaveOutput.png

Hello,

thank you for the reproducer.  The simulation is correct with
the tip version, so the bug has already been fixed.

I think the issue was in fact in the VCD dumper, but I may
remember incorrectly.

You may simply build the tip version by yourself and use it.

Thanks!
Tristan.


You can view the waves by executing:

./build.py viewFIFO

Thanks!
Endre

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Tristan Gingold <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 28/02/15 00:05, Endre Bak wrote:

        Hi,

        I ran into an issue which I cannot understand. I suspect it
        could be a
        bug in GHDL, of course it even can be that I am not aware of a very
        trivial coding issue of mine.


    Hello,

    yes, please send the file so that we can reproduce the issue.

    Tristan.


        I have two signals:

        signal writerClkCntInit: unsigned(1 downto 0) := "00";
        signal writerClkCnt: unsigned(1 downto 0) := "00";

        At the rising edge of the clock I make an assignment:

        report "writerClkCnt <= writerClkCntInit;";
        writerClkCnt <= writerClkCntInit;

        It is also reflected on the console:

        TestFIFO.vhdl:109:24:@1500ns:(__report note): rise
        TestFIFO.vhdl:78:32:@1500ns:(__report note): writerClkCnt <=
        writerClkCntInit;

        In gtkwave, before 1500ns, both signal values are "00". After the
        assignment at 1500ns writerClkCnt becomes uninitialized and
        writerClkCntInit remains unchanged ("00").

        What can cause such anomalies?  May I send the files for analysis?

        Thanks,
        Endre


        _________________________________________________
        Ghdl-discuss mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/__ghdl-discuss
        <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss>



    _________________________________________________
    Ghdl-discuss mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/__ghdl-discuss
    <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss>




_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss



_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to