On Nov 26, 2007 8:48 AM, Chris Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Eeek, no! I thought I had tried to make the purpose of this list clear. > > We already have Bugzilla and its milestones for the purpose of reminding > > us what needs to be done for 2.6. The task list is supposed to list a > > few tasks that we consider important and that show where GIMP > > development is heading. Your list now has about five times too many > > items. It will be rather difficult to get to the final list from there. > > OK - I thought it was too long also. Ignore the third version. I'm > beginning to see the light - we need a short list of the most > important items, with a nice description for each... I'll try again > tonight.
This is likely too long also and could use some more organization and detail. It's Alexandre's email to the gimp-dev list, plus a couple of items later mentioned. I followed the convention of adding a (name) after each task and a (?) if that isn't certain. Things inside brackets are just my notes. http://cr33dog.fedorapeople.org/misc/gimp_task_list_04.txt Is this enough of a starting point to finalize what should and should not be on the map? Chris _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
