On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 05:31:24PM -0500, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > should be. I am also trying to decide where scm2scm and scm2perl belong. > Should they be in gimp and gimp-perl respectively, or gimp-devel for both? scm2scm should go into gimp-devel, as it only requires perl, not gimp-perl, scm2perl should go into gimp-perl-devel, so you can choose on your own (I recommend gimp-perl). -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |
- GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Marco Lamberto
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Marc Lehmann
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Marco Lamberto
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Marc Lehmann
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Kevin Cozens
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Marco Lamberto
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Kevin Cozens
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Marc Lehmann
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Kevin Cozens
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Kevin Cozens
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 DESTDIR patch Kevin Cozens
- GIMP 1.2.0 source and binary RPM files Kevin Cozens
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 source and binary RPM files Kevin Cozens
- Re: GIMP 1.2.0 source and binary RPM files Marco Lamberto