On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Anoko wrote: > However, I do not understand why no one discusses a compromise > that does neither enforce nor burden exporting.
The secondary workflow _is_ the compromise. > Are the developers really willing to give up a "part" of their users for > something which I think can be compromised in a way both sides > are happy?? Implementing behavior options _isn't_ a compromise, it's just another way of crippling user experience. > The explanation page says "In other words, GIMP used to assume > that you don't mind accidental loss of unrecoverable project data and > bothered you with confirmation dialogs. It was a convoluted logic, > but people got used to it." > > I do not see why this is solved. Yes, you don't see it :) > Someone who is not familair with GIMP, that wants to store something > as a png file, clicks save, finds it needs to export, clicks export and has > lost their layered data nevertheless, now basically without a warning > saying layers got lost. Absolutely not. No one loses anything until confirming that by closing the project without saving as XCF. Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
