On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Jay Smith wrote: > In return, I got back a dismissive reply
You didn't :) > that IMHO completely ignored the > intent of what I was trying to say. If I skip some bits, it doesn't mean that I don't read them or disagree. It also can mean that I agree and merely reply to the bits that I disagree or want to clarify (otherwise goddamn long threads get even longer :)). Which is exactly the case here. > In summary, IF nearly every one of the developers responses included some > version of the following statement, nearly half of your "long threads" would > vanish and life would be good: > > > "We understand _____ presents a difficult situation for some > users and we regret the impact that this has had on you. > Unfortunately, we had to make difficult choices in the subject > of _______ and the result is that the program will no longer > fit the workflow of some users. We feel that the changes we > have made will be to the benefit of the majority of the user > community and we are dedicated to continuing the improvement > of Gimp for the target user community. We appreciate your > loyalty to Gimp and hope that you will find a way to adjust > your workflows so that Gimp's new behavior will work well > for you. Thank you for expressing your concern. Please know > that we have heard you, even if the changes we have had to make > are not favorable for you, and that we will continue to work > on improving the program to be the best that it can be for > the target user community." I can use that in the new FAQ with your permission. How about that? Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
