On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:11 PM, maderios wrote: >>> Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: >>> - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior >>> - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to >>> save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors >>> images. >>> This would allow everyone to be satisfied >> >> >> Except for developers who would have to maintain two versions. But who >> cares about them, eh? >> > I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and > maintenance would be small. Another solution would consist in keeping single > Gimp but in proposing two possible configurations. Even approach as for > both interfaces.
I realize it might sound arrogant, but do you understand the meaning of the word "no"? Alexandre _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
