On 08/10/2013 12:15 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:11 PM, maderios wrote:

Developers could offer two versions of Gimp:
- One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior
- One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to
save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors
images.
This would allow everyone to be satisfied


Except for developers who would have to maintain two versions. But who
cares about them, eh?

I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and
maintenance would be small. Another solution would consist in keeping single
Gimp but in proposing two possible configurations. Even approach  as for
both interfaces.

I realize it might sound arrogant, but do you understand the meaning
of the word "no"?

The word " no " exists only for the pessimists...  :-)
--
Maderios


_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

Reply via email to