Hi Fred - Please don't wait around for me to upload the test image that I mentioned previously. In attempting to get this ready for you, I have encountered some unexpected behavior that I am presently evaluating. I am able to open and work with larger files than I experienced previously. Something must have changed on my system, but I have no idea what it could be. Suffice it to say at the moment that it doesn't look like the GIMP has a memory limit that affects my usage under Windows after all! I'll get back to you and the list later with more details once I'm certain that I can believe what seems to be happening. Thanks once again for offering to help.
Regards, Kevin M. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "gimp users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "gimpwin users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "gimpwin developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:11 PM Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Image Size Limits > Sorry Fred and all, my apologies, 400KB was a serious typo. That should > have read 400MB! > > s/KAM > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fred Bazolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "gimp users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:12 PM > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Image Size Limits > > > I am curious about your file sizes though: 400 KB doesn't sound all that > big; > actually, that sounds pretty small. Also, I'm not very technical so bear > with > me, but isn't 5 times 400 KB about 2.0 MB? What am I missing here? > > On Wednesday 08 January 2003 23:31, Kevin Myers wrote: > > Under Windows I am running into a problem where the GIMP's pixel buffer > > seems to hit a 2GB file size limit when my gray scale TIFF image files > > excede roughly 400KB in size. I'm guessing the buffer requires 5 bytes > per > > pixel (RGB, transparency, ?), even though all of that isn't really needed > > for my images. > > > > I need to work with these images absolutely ASAP. Because all of the > > machines involved are running Windoze, I was hoping to stick with that. > > However, it's starting to look like that is a hopeless cause given my poor > > porting skills and the apparant lack of interest of most gimp developers > in > > addressing this problem under Windoze (at least in the near term). > > > > So, I'm starting to consider using Linux instead, and have two related > > questions: > > > > 1. Can anyone out there positively confirm that running the GIMP under a > > fairly recent version of Linux would avoid any inherent 2GB pixel buffer > > size limit? I can provide some images for testing if anyone would like to > > volunteer... > > > > 2. Would anyone out there care to suggest a readily available commercial > > Linux distribution that is extremely easy to install, learn, and use for > > unsophisticated users with primarily Windblows experience? > > > > Thanks in advance for any help. > > > > s/KAM > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gimp-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
