--- Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 02:12:22AM +0200, Marco Wessel wrote: > > > > My guess is that this is because of the interpolation when resampling. > > Makes it less easily compressable. (Notice the 'anti-aliased' edges in > > the resized picture?) > > > > Marco Wessel > > Any suggestion as to how to fix it?
Retake the screenshot, after reducing the size of the window. Really. Resizing without anti-aliasing is like cutting 1 pixel slivers out of the image, and can make vertical or horizontal lines disappear out of the image. At 52Kb, the image size is satisfactory for broadband/LAN users. If the image is to be used on the web, why not consider using the image size attributes of HTML to automatically rescale the image? http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/objects.html#h-13.2 http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/objects.html#visual You could also reduce the colour depth without any noticable drop in quality. Applications usually keep to a 256 colour default pallet. Magic bullets not found here. Jonathan Paton ===== #!perl $J=' 'x25 ;for (qq< 1+10 9+14 5-10 50-9 7+13 2-18 6+13 17+6 02+1 2-10 00+4 00+8 3-13 3+12 01-5 2-10 01+1 03+4 00+4 00+8 1-21 01+1 00+5 01-7 >=~/ \S\S \S\S /gx) {m/( \d+) (.+) /x,, vec$ J,$p +=$2 ,8,= $c+= +$1} warn $J,, __________________________________________________ Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
